Research

Initial inventory created by an LMM is not the same as committed investor seed, yet the overlap in language often confuses new issuers. Clarity on both sides is essential to launching with credibility and sufficient scale.
As investor preferences evolve, legacy fund structures can’t keep up. ETFs offer simplicity, flexibility, and tax advantages that resonate with today’s market. The migration has become inevitable.
Imagine managing a single portfolio that serves both ETF and mutual fund investors. That vision is moving closer to reality as the SEC approved the first modern ETF share class structure. This structural shift could redefine efficiency, scale, and performance across the asset management industry.
Investors sometimes misinterpret distribution changes as signals of portfolio missteps. In reality, implied volatility is the underlying factor shaping how much income covered call and put strategies can deliver. By understanding IV cycles, investors can set more realistic expectations about option income streams.
In just three years, assets in income-oriented option strategies have quadrupled to $230B. Retail investors are enjoying distributions and convenience with payouts that align with real-world expenses. The growth highlights just how powerful consistent income can be in today’s markets.
Single stock leveraged ETFs have become a mainstream tool for traders seeking bigger, faster gains. Issuers are rushing to meet demand with products tied to the market’s most talked-about names. But with greater earning potential comes greater risk, and many investors underestimate how quickly these funds can cut both ways.
Many assume that being the “adviser” in an ETF structure guarantees influence over the fund. In practice, the real levers of control are hidden in trust management and governance, legal agreements, and operational frameworks. This article breaks down the three operational paths to launching an ETF and why the adviser vs. sub-adviser debate often misses the bigger picture.
Since the start of September 2025, the ETF industry reflects a dynamic blend of enduring investor priorities and emerging themes reshaping the landscape. U.S. ETF assets have reached $12.5 trillion, with year-to-date net inflows of $784 billion, already outpacing the $593 billion gathered during the same time span in 2024.
From U.S. equities to complex strategies, ETFs consistently prove more tax efficient than peers. But efficiency depends on smart management, especially for asset classes like bonds, emerging markets, or crypto. With the right execution, ETFs offer the opportunity to transform structural quirks into investor advantages.
A Section 351 conversion aligns investor tax priorities with the ETF’s structural advantages. For managers, it enables scale and speed-to-market across strategies that can’t easily be replicated in SMAs. Understanding the regulatory thresholds and market mechanics is essential before moving forward.